It appears that FOX News is going to focus its attention on the alleged alteration of the intelligence talking points that Ambassador Rice used to dissemble on the five Sunday news shows two months ago. (The non-FOX News doesn't care one way or the other save for the fact that it's a timely and very welcome distraction.) This is a mistake.
I wasn't there, so I can't know what actually transpired. But, judging from the reports of the congressmen who were, I know I would have reacted very differently to Petraeus's testimony.
What do I mean?
Had I been there, as soon as I heard the former CIA Chief say to those of us assembled that not only did he know from the beginning that it was a terrorist attack, but that he said as much at the time, I would have raised up out of my chair, and while shaking my fist at him shouted something like: "The hell you did General! Not only did you testify to the contrary at the time, but it was widely reported that you did so. If indeed your initial testimony was otherwise, not only have you not seen fit to correct the record during the intervening two months, but every @#$%& representative of this feckless administration, from the President to the janitor, has used since then that very testimony to hide behind. Now, while my aid goes to retrieve copies of the transcript from your prior visit with us, I suggest you think a little harder and perhaps remember a little more clearly exactly what it was you said back then. And remember General, this time you're under oath."
But that probably explains why I'm not now, and probably never will be a congressman.
Friday, November 16, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment